Though I have grave concerns with the ID movement, I find the concerns mentioned by the neo- Darwinian Michael Ruse to be telling:

“With wife [of Michael Behe], Celeste, doing the homeschooling of quite a few of these nine offspring, the Behe household is indeed stretched, but according to Darwinist opponent Michael Ruse, it bodes well for the future of ID. He quipped, ‘Even if you can’t beat us with your arguments, you’re likely to take over by overpopulating us!’”

Thomas Woodward, Darwin Strikes Back: Defending the Science of Intelligent Design (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2006), p. 66.