Your browser is not supported.

Your Web browser is not supported by this site, and may not work correctly. For best results, please download a recent version of Mozilla Firefox or another mainstream browser.
(866) 440-0022

Doug's Blog: What Black's Law Dictionary Says About Chief Justice Moore's Actions: The Doctrine of Interposition

Dougs Blog

« | Main | Dick Bott: Another Defender of Truth During Our Hour of Crisis »

What Black's Law Dictionary Says About Chief Justice Moore's Actions: The Doctrine of Interposition

Interposition: The doctrine that a state, in the exercise of its sovereignty, may reject a mandate of the federal government deemed to be unconstitutional or to exceed the powers delegated to the federal government.

The concept is based on the 10th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States reserving to the states powers not delegated to the United States. Historically, the doctrine emanated from Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dallas 419, wherein the state of Georgia, when sued in the Supreme Court by a private citizen of another state, entered a remonstrance and declined to recognize the court’s jurisdiction. Amendment 11 validated Georgia’s position.

Implementation of the doctrine may be peaceable, as by resolution, remonstrance or legislation, or may proceed ultimately to nullification with forcible resistance.

To read more on the doctrine of Interposition, check Visionforum.org tomorow for our posting of a brilliant article by Constitutional scholar, Dr. John Eidsmoe, Esq.

  • We accept Visa
  • MasterCard
  • American Express
  • and Discover

Over 200,000

Satisfied Customers
Since 1998

See Testimonials

E-Mail Newsletters

Christian Worldview and Product Specials

Details
Details